Wilm's tumour gene, WT1
The WT1 protein is encoded by the WT1 gene located on chromosome 11p1315 and has four protein isoforms27. It encodes a 4 zinc finger protein that binds to the same DNA sequences as does ERG-111. While ERG-1 activates transcription, WT1 suppresses transcription. The suppressor function is lost in mutations that affect the zinc finger region11. Candidate target genes for WT-1 include e-cadherin and bcl-2, and there is interaction with p5321.
Germline deletion of one WT-1 allele, along with the neighbouring PAX6 gene, occur in the WAGR syndrome (Wilms tumour, aniridia, genitourinary abnormalities and mental retardation)19. In the Denys-Drash syndrome, there is a missense mutation effecting zinc finger 3 or a or truncating mutation, resulting in Wilms tumour, nephropathy and genital malformation, but with partial penetrance19. A homozygous knockout mouse model fails to develop kidneys or gonads and has small heart and lungs with a incomplete diaphragm19.
Alternative RNA splicing results at least twenty four isoforms22 of WT1 with variation in the carboxy-end zinc finger region. Of two major isoforms, the -KTS form appears to mediate transcriptional activation of genes, while the +KTS form may be involved in mRNA processing23. This variety of isoforms might theoretically influence immunoreactivity of the polyclonal antibody C-19, which is directed at the carboxyl end. The monoclonal 6F-H2 is directed at the amino terminus13. The 6F-H2 antibody is reported to produce stronger homogeneous reactivity than the C-19 clone in serous ovarian tumours13, but to produce no immunoreactivity in desmoplastic small round cell tumours1.
Although WT-1 is expressed in Wilms tumour, only 10% of sporadic cases show WT-1 mutations19. There is commonly loss of heterozygocity in ovarian tumours21.
Immunohistochemical expression
The informative immunoreactivity is nuclear.
-
the mesodermally derived tissue of the developing urogenital tract: fetal and adult kidney and developing ovary and testis show positivity19. The epithelia of the Fallopian tube and the ovarian surface are immunoreactive16, while endometrium and cervical epithelia are not14.
-
breast epithelium and myoepithelium are positive but many carcinomas are negative, using antibody C-1920.
-
fetal spleen
-
non-germ cells of the gonads28
-
fetal and adult28 mesothelium, and mesothelioma. Staining is reportedly weaker in post mortem specimens that in the corresponding ante mortem mesothelioma specimens2.
-
The ovarian surface epithelium and ovarian inclusion cysts stain29. Ovarian adenocarcinoma is positive, most other adenocarcinomas are negative:
|
Ovary
|
Assorted
|
25/30(8 primary serous carcinomas, 5 primary endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and 17 metastatic serous carcinomas to the lung [6] or to the peritoneum [11])6
|
|
serous
|
16/1710,
38/41(moderate or strong but patchy in 26 cases, weak in 12 cases.)15,
29/30(The 6F-H2 antibody produced stronger homogeneous reactivity than did the C-19 clone)13,
25/25In all cases, at least 5% of nuclei stained.)16, 9/917, 36/3818,
14/16(borderline tumours)18,
positive(results given as average number of nuclei staining, 42±34% cross 27 cases)14,
24/28(median H-score 45, mean 67 ± 12)21
|
mixed serous/endometrioid
|
2/210,
2/2(serous component positive)17
|
endometrioid
|
1/110, 0/1516, 1/517, 0/3818,
negative(results given as average number of nuclei staining, 2 ± 3% cross 11 cases)14, 0/1121, 2/1824
|
mucinous
|
0/1215, 0/1516, 0/117,
?(results given as average number of nuclei staining, 24 ± 29% cross 10 cases)14, 0/1121
|
Brenner tumour, benign
|
4/1717
|
Brenner tumour, malignant
|
14/1717
|
clear cell
|
0/210, 0/1516, 1/417,
?(results given as average number of nuclei staining, 10 ± 17% across 21 cases)14,
4/18(median H-score 0)21, 0/1124
|
small cell carcinoma of pulmonary type
|
0/232
|
small cell carcinoma of hypercalcaemia type
|
14/1530, 6/732
|
Fallopian tube
|
primary serous carcinoma
|
13/13(In all cases, staining was diffuse and strong. 11 cases showed metastases, which were also positive.)16,
12/12(median H-score 180)21
|
primary endometrioid carcinoma
|
0/221
|
Peritoneum, primary serous carcinoma
|
3/316, 6/618,
19/20(median H-score 108)21
|
Breast
|
2/29(metastases from breast)10, 0/256,
6/21(using antibody C-19: positivity is more common in high-grade ER-negative / p53-positive tumours)20
|
Uterine
|
serous
|
0/1813, 0/516,
5/25(3+ staining in only two cases)18,
10/16(median H-score 7.5, mean 23 ± 8)21
|
endometrial
|
0/210, 0/718, 0/3521
|
clear cell
|
0/1821
|
Cervical small cell carcinoma
|
1/832
|
Transitional cell carcinoma of bladder
|
0/1517
|
Lung, adenocarcinoma
|
0/3310, 0/406
|
Lung, small cell carcinoma
|
1/2232
|
Oesophagus, adenocarcinoma
|
0/210
|
Gallbladder, adenocarcinoma
|
0/110
|
Stomach, adenocarcinoma
|
0/310
|
Colon, adenocarcinoma
|
0/106
|
Pancreaticobiliary, adenocarcinoma
|
0/210, 0/6415
|
Kidney, adenocarcinoma
|
0/106
|
Prostate, adenocarcinoma
|
0/210, 0/106
|
Thyroid, adenocarcinoma
|
0/106
|
|
|
|
Where there is both peritoneal serous carcinoma and serous carcinoma within an endometrial polyp, they are concordantly negative for WT-1, suggesting that the peritoneal tumour is metastatic from the endometrial primary27:
|
Ovarian serous carcinoma
|
11/1227
|
|
Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma
|
8/1027
|
Primary uterine serous carcinoma
|
1/927
|
Peritoneal serous carcinoma with serous carcinoma in a uterine polyp
|
1/9(there is concordance of the peritoneal and endometrial components)27
|
It is NOT expressed by:
Diagnostic utility
|
adenocarcinoma
|
mesothelioma
|
Amin 19953 (monoclonal antibody, non-commercial)
|
0/26
|
20/21
|
Kumar-Singh 19974 (monoclonal antibody, non-commercial)
|
3/14(various sites of origin; the positive cases were 2 ovarian and 1 renal)
|
39/41
|
Oates 20005 (polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz)
|
8/40(primary lung adenocarcinomas)
|
18/42
|
Ordonez 20006 (polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz)
|
25/115(various sites of origin; all positive cases were ovarian)
|
36/50
|
Foster 20017 (polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz)
|
0/51(primary lung adenocarcinomas: 44 cases showed cytoplasmic staining of varying degrees)
|
50/67(8 cases showed predominantly cytoplasmic staining)
|
Miettinen 20018 (polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz)
|
not studied
|
12/21(12/17 epithelioid, 0/4 sarcomatoid: staining was nuclear)
|
Ordonez 20039 (monoclonal antibody, Dako 6F-H2)
|
0/50(primary lung adenocarcinomas)
|
56/60(all epithelioid mesotheliomas: 27 cases >75% of cells, 16 cases 50-75% of cells, 9 cases 25-50% of cells, 4 cases 1-25% of cells)
|
Pan 200325 (polyclonal Santa Cruz)
|
0/1425
|
7/1225
|
Chu 200526 (monoclonal antibody, Dako 6F-H2)
|
29/91(2 of 31 primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas, 4 of 34 renal, 23/26 ovarian serous)26
|
29/49(19 of 33 epithelioid, 10 of 16 biphasic; also 0/4 sarcomatous)26
|
Overall
|
4% (15/348, excluding ovarian tumours)
|
76% (238/314)
|
A systematic review of eight studies (consisting of 264 epithelioid mesotheliomas and 213 pulmonary adenocarcinomas) reported sensitivities and specificities of WT-1 for epithelioid mesothelioma of 77% and 96%31.
Further studies are needed to see whether the high rate of positivity in epithelioid mesothelioma obtained by Ordonez9 using a newly available monoclonal antibody can be reproduced. Note that WT1 is commonly expressed by serous carcinomas of the ovary6.
DSRCT
|
EWS/PNET
|
13/13 positive, using C-191
|
0/11 positive1
|
-
Identification of the primary site of adenocarcinomas, being commonly positive in ovarian but negative in breast carcinoma10.
-
Differentiation of ovarian and peritoneal from uterine serous carcinomas. One paper reports positivity in uterine as well as ovarian serous tumours; although staining is significantly stronger in ovarian tumours, overlap was thought to limit the diagnostic value21. Adjuvant therapies differ, uterine serous tumours being less responsive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy than are ovarian serous tumours13.
-
WT1 has recently been proposed as a complementary marker for malignant melanoma.
References
1 Hill AD et al. WT1 staining reliably differentiates desmoplastic small round cell tumor from Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor. An immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic study. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:345-353.
2 Roberts, F., McCall, A. E., Burnett, R. A. Malignant mesothelioma: a comparison of biopsy and postmortem material by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:766-70.
3 Amin, K. M., L. A. Litzky, et al. (1995). "Wilms' tumor 1 susceptibility (WT1) gene products are selectively expressed in malignant mesothelioma." Am J Pathol 146(2): 344-56.
4 Kumar-Singh, S., K. Segers, et al. (1997). "WT1 mutation in malignant mesothelioma and WT1 immunoreactivity in relation to p53 and growth factor receptor expression, cell-type transition, and prognosis." J Pathol 181(1): 67-74.
5 Oates, J. and C. Edwards (2000). "HBME-1, MOC-31, WT1 and calretinin: an assessment of recently described markers for mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma." Histopathology 36(4): 341-7.
6 Ordonez, N. G. (2000). "Value of thyroid transcription factor-1, E-cadherin, BG8, WT1, and CD44S immunostaining in distinguishing epithelial pleural mesothelioma from pulmonary and nonpulmonary adenocarcinoma." Am J Surg Pathol 24(4): 598-606.
7 Foster, M. R., J. E. Johnson, et al. (2001). "Immunohistochemical analysis of nuclear versus cytoplasmic staining of WT1 in malignant mesotheliomas and primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas." Arch Pathol Lab Med 125(10): 1316-20.
8 Miettinen, M., J. Limon, et al. (2001). "Calretinin and other mesothelioma markers in synovial sarcoma: analysis of antigenic similarities and differences with malignant mesothelioma." Am J Surg Pathol 25(5): 610-7.
9 Ordonez, N. G. (2003). "The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma: a comparative study of epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma." Am J Surg Pathol 27(8): 1031-51.
10 Lee, B. H., J. L. Hecht, et al. (2002). "WT1, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor as markers for breast or ovarian primary sites in metastatic adenocarcinoma to body fluids." Am J Clin Pathol 117(5): 745-50.
11 Rauscher, F. J., 3rd, J. F. Morris, et al. (1990). "Binding of the Wilms' tumor locus zinc finger protein to the EGR-1 consensus sequence." Science 250(4985): 1259-62.
12 Lae, M. E., P. C. Roche, et al. (2002). "Desmoplastic small round cell tumor: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 32 tumors." Am J Surg Pathol 26(7): 823-35.
13 Goldstein, N. S. and A. Uzieblo (2002). "WT1 immunoreactivity in uterine papillary serous carcinomas is different from ovarian serous carcinomas." Am J Clin Pathol 117(4): 541-5.
14 Shimizu, M., T. Toki, et al. (2000). "Immunohistochemical detection of the Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) in epithelial ovarian tumors." Int J Gynecol Pathol 19(2): 158-63.
15 Goldstein, N. S., D. Bassi, et al. (2001). "WT1 is an integral component of an antibody panel to distinguish pancreaticobiliary and some ovarian epithelial neoplasms." Am J Clin Pathol 116(2): 246-52.
16 Hashi, A., T. Yuminamochi, et al. (2003). "Wilms tumor gene immunoreactivity in primary serous carcinomas of the fallopian tube, ovary, endometrium, and peritoneum." Int J Gynecol Pathol 22(4): 374-7.
17 Logani, S., E. Oliva, et al. (2003). "Immunoprofile of ovarian tumors with putative transitional cell (urothelial) differentiation using novel urothelial markers: histogenetic and diagnostic implications." Am J Surg Pathol 27(11): 1434-41.
18 Al-Hussaini, M., A. Stockman, et al. (2004). "WT-1 assists in distinguishing ovarian from uterine serous carcinoma and in distinguishing between serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma." Histopathology 44(2): 109-15.
19 Pritchard-Jones, K. and L. King-Underwood (1997). "The Wilms tumour gene WT1 in leukaemia." Leuk Lymphoma 27(3-4): 207-20.
20 Silberstein, G. B., K. Van Horn, et al. (1997). "Altered expression of the WT1 wilms tumor suppressor gene in human breast cancer." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(15): 8132-7.
21 Acs, G., T. Pasha, et al. (2004). "WT1 is differentially expressed in serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinomas of the peritoneum, fallopian tube, ovary, and endometrium." Int J Gynecol Pathol 23(2): 110-8.
22 Scharnhorst, V., A. J. van der Eb, et al. (2001). "WT1 proteins: functions in growth and differentiation." Gene 273(2): 141-61.
23 Lee, S. B. and D. A. Haber (2001). "Wilms tumor and the WT1 gene." Exp Cell Res 264(1): 74-99. This study used clone 6F-H2.
24 Ramalingam, P., A. Malpica, et al. (2004). "The use of cytokeratin 7 and EMA in differentiating ovarian yolk sac tumors from endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas." Am J Surg Pathol 28(11): 1499-1505.
25 Pan, C. C., P. C. Chen, et al. (2003). "Expression of calretinin and other mesothelioma-related markers in thymic carcinoma and thymoma." Hum Pathol 34(11): 1155-62.
26 Chu AY, Litzky LA, Pasha TL, Acs G,Zhang PJ Utility of D2-40, a novel mesothelial marker, in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 2005; 18:105-10
27 Euscher ED, Malpica A, Deavers MT, et al. Differential expression of WT-1 in serous carcinomas in the peritoneum with or without associated serous carcinoma in endometrial polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1074-8
28 Gulyas M,Hjerpe A Proteoglycans and WT1 as markers for distinguishing adenocarcinoma, epithelioid mesothelioma, and benign mesothelium. J Pathol 2003; 199:479-87
29 O'Neill CJ, Deavers MT, Malpica A, et al. An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1034-41
30 McCluggage WG, Oliva E, Connolly LE, et al. An immunohistochemical analysis of ovarian small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23:330-6
31 King JE, Thatcher N, Pickering CA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a detailed systematic analysis using published data. Histopathology 2006; 48:223-32
32 Carlson JW, Nucci MR, Brodsky J, et al. Biomarker-assisted diagnosis of ovarian, cervical and pulmonary small cell carcinomas: the role of TTF-1, WT-1 and HPV analysis. Histopathology 2007; 51:305-12
This page last revised 30.11.2007.
©SMUHT/PW Bishop