CA
125
Ca-125 is a high
molecular weight cell surface glycoprotein. This glycoprotein is
recognised by the monoclonal antibody OC 125.
Immunohistochemical expression
The antigen is
expressed by
-
adenocarcinomas of
the ovary, cervix uteri, endometrium, gastrointestinal tract, breast
and thyroid.
|
Ovarian adenocarcinoma |
60/861 |
|
|
Papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri |
9/123 |
|
|
Breast adenocarcinoma |
21/1071 |
|
Colorectal adenocarcinoma |
13/941 |
Pulmonary tumours |
7/102 |
|
|
Diagnostic utility
Although
there is considerable overlap in immunoreactivity, positivity for CA
125 and HAM56, along with negative or weak staining for CEA,
tend to favour an ovarian rather than a colorectal site for an adenocarcinoma.
References
Diagnostic histopathology of tumors. Edited by CDM Fletcher. 2nd
edition. Churchill Livingstone. Page 623.
1
Lagendijk, J. H., H. Mullink, et al. (1999). "Immunohistochemical
differentiation between primary adenocarcinomas of the ovary and
ovarian metastases of colonic and breast origin. Comparison between a
statistical and an intuitive approach." J Clin Pathol 52(4): 283-90.
2 Nouwen
EJ, Pollet DE, Eerdekens MW, et al. Immunohistochemical localization
of placental alkaline phosphatase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and
cancer antigen 125 in normal and neoplastic human lung. Cancer Res
1986; 46:866-76
3 Zhou
C, Gilks CB, Hayes M, et al. Papillary serous carcinoma of the
uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Am J Surg
Pathol 1998; 22:113-20
Davis
HM, Zurawski VR, Jr., Bast RC, Jr., et al. Characterization of the
CA 125 antigen associated with human epithelial ovarian carcinomas.
Cancer Res 1986; 46:6143-8
Quirk
JG, Jr., Brunson GL, Long CA, et al. CA 125 in tissues and amniotic
fluid during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:644-9
Fukazawa
I, Inaba N, Ota Y, et al. Relation between serum levels of tissue
polypeptide antigen (TPA) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and their
immunohistochemical identification in benign and malignant
gynecological disease. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988; 243:41-50
©SMUHT/PW Bishop