Differentiation of mesotheliomas from adenocarcinomas:
|
adenocarcinoma |
mesothelioma |
Jordan 19891 |
18/18 (pulmonary adenocarcinomas) |
7/30 |
Battifora 19952 |
108/125 (various sites of origin; staining was stronger than in the positive mesotheliomas) |
10/100 (epithelial or biphasic mesotheliomas) |
Riera 19973 |
187/211 (various sites of origin) |
5/57 |
Wilson 19974 |
9/9 (pulmonary and ovarian carcinomas) |
5/21 |
Ordonez 20005 |
114/135 (39/40 lung, 25/25 breast, 26/30 ovary, 9/10 colon, 1/10 kidney, 6/10 thyroid, 8/10 prostate) |
3/50 |
Ordonez 20036 |
48/50 (all primary lung adenocarcinomas: 21 case >75% of cells stained, 15 cases 50-75% of cells, 7 cases 25-50% of cells, 6 cases 1-25% of cells and 1 cases <1% of cells. Staining cytoplasmic and membranous) |
4/60 (all epithelioid mesotheliomas: 2 cases 1-25% of cells and 2 cases <1% of cells.) |
Overall |
88% (484/548) |
11% (34/318) |
A systematic review of three studies (consisting of 231 pulmonary adenocarcinomas and 197 epithelioid mesotheliomas) reported sensitivities and specificities of BerEP4 for pulmonary adenocarcinoma of 93% and 93%7.
References
1 Jordan D, Jagirdar J, Kaneko M. Blood group antigens, Lewisx and Lewisy in the diagnostic discrimination of malignant mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol 1989;135:931-7.
2 Battifora H. Diffuse malignant mesothelioma. In Battifora H, McCaughey WTE, eds. Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the serosal membranes, page 71, 3rd series fascicle 15, AFIP.
4 Wilson JD, Merino MJ, Harris C et al. Mesothelioma vs adenocarcinma: does immunohsitochemsitry help? Lab Invest 1997;76:174A.
This page last revised 16.2.2006.
©SMUHT/PW Bishop